Is Goodwin guilty of too much tinkering?published at 12:52 GMT 4 November 2025
Paul McNicoll
Fan writer

When it comes to picking a first XI I'm a big advocate of horses for courses, but down Tannadice way recently there seems to have been an awful lot of chopping and changing from week to week. Different formations, different personnel.
Now I appreciate, if recent results had been more favourable, I likely wouldn't feel the need to raise this question, but recent results and performances haven't been great, so it's getting raised.
Should United focus more on themselves than on what they should do to stop the opposition?
Look at Motherwell, for example. They've got a clear identity. They play the same way every week. Come rain, shine, or a 3-0 deficit, you know exactly what you're getting with them.
It might not always come off, but at least the players look like they know which way they're supposed to be kicking. There's something to be said for that.
So does Jim Goodwin need to stick to a formation he believes in and go with it? Or should he continue doing what he is doing at present, the horses for courses method?
I suspect he won't change, and I'm also not overly pushing for the change, but it does merit mentioning.
As for the recent run of results and performances, perhaps the team are just struggling at the moment, and it's merely coincidence that different formations/players have been employed, almost from game to game, while the form has dipped. Who can say?
Whatever the reason, the next test is a trip to Tynecastle and if Goodwin doesn't get his selection right there, it could be a very long afternoon in Gorgie.
Let's just hope the horses he picks that day can actually gallop, because Hearts won't be standing still waiting for us to catch up.
Paul McNicoll can be found at The Dode Fox Podcast, external



















